Snapfast
I designed an agent that reads real posts in a creator’s circle and recommends the next one. The creator still publishes.
AI Agents & Workflows
For teams that want a working proof of an agent or workflow before they fund a platform.
Tell me what’s broken and where you’re stuck.
Stakeholders and users react to a real prototype before a full build is on the table.
Goals, tools, guardrails, and handoffs are defined around a real task, so the agent behaves inside the workflow people already have.
States, handoffs, and controls are designed so the team understands what the system did and trusts it enough to use it.
APIs and current AI tools, chosen to fit your environment and stay maintainable after handoff.
When the prototype holds up, you get requirements, UX specs, and front-end your team can ship and maintain.
We choose a single task the agent or workflow must complete. A demo with no job is out of scope.
Goals, tools, guardrails, and the handoff back to a person. The human stays in control until the data says otherwise.
A clickable or working prototype your stakeholders and users can react to. This is the test, not the platform.
If it holds up, you get specs and front-end your team can extend. If it does not, you stop before the expensive build.
I designed an agent that reads real posts in a creator’s circle and recommends the next one. The creator still publishes.
I put AI on document sorting, exam codes, and boundary sketches. A step is fully automated only after 99 of 100 examiner approvals.
I prototyped the workspace people could use: upload a wave, check it, publish the results.
This is for
You have a repetitive job, an existing team, and you want a prototype people can trust before you scale.
This is not for
Not a fit if you want a generic chatbot with no workflow, or a full platform build with no prototype in between.